Far too many annunciation systems installed in industrial facilities during the 1980s and 1990s are redundant today and unsupported by the original manufacturer. Worryingly, many of these are no longer able to operate at their full potential.
When its Bristol Babcock process alarm system began failing, Fiddler’s Ferry Power Station (a coal fired power station located in Warrington, Cheshire in North West England) requested information about upgrade options.
The existing alarm system consisted of many Bristol Babcock alarm logic subracks that fed data via Modbus serial into the advanced plant management system (APMS). The replacement needed to replicate the functionality of the previous one, while using Modbus TCP via a dual redundant ethernet network. It also needed to incorporate additional remote panels located around the plant and fit into the same physical space as the previous system.
Omniflex designed a bespoke replacement that met all the functional requirements of the old system as well as incorporating sub one milli-seconds sequence of events technology. The replacement alarm logic subracks were designed to fit into the available space so they were accessible for both installation and ongoing maintenance. Additionally, as the existing APMS wasn’t compatible with the sequence of events timestamping, Omniflex used a new engineered SCADA workstation to log and display the time stamped alarms. All alarm logic subracks were also fitted with time synchronisation using a GPS time sync module.
The replacement system was engineered to fit into the housing of the original alarm logic subracks, and was pre-wired and tested on back plates. As the generator cooling panel was fitted into an ‘L’ shaped space, an ‘L’ shaped back plate was created for the new alarm logic subracks.
Moreover, as most of the work was done off site, installation time was drastically reduced, minimising disruption to the station’s operation. With little disruption to its operations, Fiddler’s Ferry Power Station now has a modern distributed alarm system, with the added benefit of sub one milli-second time stamped alarms that are accessible to engineers for detailed analysis if required.
Ferrybridge: a case in point
When Ferrybridge ‘C’ Power Station (one of three coal-fired power stations situated on the River Aire near Ferrybridge in West Yorkshire, England) needed to replace its obsolete and failing MPAS90 process alarm system with a new one that incorporated sub one milli-second Sequence of Events technology, it also approached my company for a replacement solution.
The existing alarm system consisted of MPAS90 alarm logic subracks with hardwired alarm fascias located on each of the units around the station. The replacement system needed to interface with the existing FactoryLink site-wide SCADA system and all the field signals, which had smaller hardwired alarm fascias and a PC based alarm management system. The system also needed to be networked together, requiring accurate time synchronisation of the alarm logic nodes spread across the site to ensure sequence of events data was valid.
One of the key challenges facing our team was to design the replacement system to fit into the existing space, which was limited. The replacement alarm logic subracks therefore had to be engineered to fit precisely into the existing panels with enough space around so installation was manageable. The water treatment area of the plant comprised of three large annunciators so it was necessary to engineer a solution that consolidated the alarms using blanking plates to cover the existing holes to mount the new logic.
The replacement system incorporated sub 1 milli-seconds time stamped alarms into the existing SCADA and rationalised the hardwired alarm fascias around the site, creating a more coherent alarm strategy where urgent alarms, along with grouped non-urgent alarms, were displayed and logged on the SCADA system. This helped the station to manage plant issues more efficiently, resulting in an overall higher efficiency.
Every plant manager fears the failure of alarm systems, especially if they were fitted with systems from the 1980s or 1990s and are therefore highly likely to be obsolete. However, replacing a failing or obsolete alarm system doesn’t have to be a timely or costly exercise and can safeguard facilities when a system fails without causing major disruption.